Journal: bioRxiv
Article Title: Antiviral drug synergy and mutational signatures in different epithelial cell models of RSV and hPIV infection
doi: 10.64898/2026.01.13.699296
Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Comparison of cell toxicity versus viral-GFP intensity (relative fluorescence units) at 7 days post-infection with RSVA or hPIV3 (both at MOI 0.02) with the epithelial cell lines VeroE6, Calu-3 or LLC-MK2 (n=3). Dashed box indicates cell lines chosen for subsequent antiviral assays. B-C. Representative images of the antiviral infection assay in 96-well format demonstrating dynamic range, here showing RSV infection of VeroE6 cells with and without single or dual-drug antiviral treatments. Cytopathology is visualised by endpoint crystal violet staining of adherent cells (B), whilst the fluorescence micrograph of same representative assay plate (C) demonstrates visualisation of GFP-tagged RSVA infection. D. Relationship between cell viability (quantified by crystal violet absorbance) and viral GFP fluorescence, as normalised against virus-only and mock controls. Representative dose response curves are modelled on data for remdesivir against RSVA. E-L. Dose response curves for monotherapy concentrations of remdesivir (E&I), favipiravir (F&J), EIDD-1931 (G&K), and ribavirin (H&L) tested against RSVA (E-H) or hPIV3 (I-L) infection. The viral inhibition % model is shown as the blue line, while cytotoxicity (as a % reduction of adherent cells) is indicated by the red line. The shaded box indicates drug concentrations with cytotoxicity exceeding 20%. (n=5 for RSVA, n=3-4 for hPIV3)
Article Snippet: Human lung adenocarcinoma cell line Calu-3 (HTB-55, ATCC) and rhesus monkey kidney cell line LLC-MK2 (CCL-7, Caltag-Medsystems Ltd) were maintained in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS, Thermo Fisher) and 1× penicillin/streptomycin.
Techniques: Comparison, Fluorescence, Infection, Staining, Virus, Inhibition